User talk:Hello.Zahid

Welcome!

Hello, Hello.Zahid, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — kashmiri ^TALK 02:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khaleej Mag

Hello Hello.Zahid,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Khaleej Mag for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —CaroleHenson (talk) 01:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hello.Zahid -- thanks for the message on my talk page. As I'm sure you understand, Wikipedia is not a directory of all online magazines, of which enormous numbers start up each year. The encyclopedia only covers the most important examples, and usually these are ones that have been established for more than around 18 months. As CaroleHenson advised you, it is probably too soon to have an article on Khaleej Mag. The specific guidelines for online content are here. What is needed is in-depth coverage of the magazine by several reliable sources such as books, national newspapers and magazines, or television documentaries. Coverage need not necessarily be in English but must be independent of Khaleej Mag and its publishing company, and must go beyond directory listings, brief mentions or press releases. I hope this helps you -- the Teahouse is a friendly forum for newcomers, if you need more advice. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Techhub Connect

The article Techhub Connect has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Purely promotional. No independent evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Plan 9 Startup Incubator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plan 9 Startup Incubator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan 9 Startup Incubator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 04:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Plan 9 Startup Incubator. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Techhub Connect. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 01:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Neelam Muneer has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. https://www.cloudpix.co/dsc-copy-neelam-muneer-1210587.html General Ization ^Talk 16:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of IMZahidIqbal (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije has blocked me from editing the Wikipedia by saying I have multiple accounts. He claimed username (iMZahidIqbal) belongs to me. I do not have any relation with this account. If the other person name is same as me It does not mean I am only person in this world with this name. Please take care of it and unblock me.

Why Blocked?

Vanjagenije please respond me why you have blocked me? It does not make sense you have considered a person with the similar name as my duplicate account. Please restore my access.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hello.Zahid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have any other account here at Wikipedia. I have applied in the WikiMania with my profile and you are killing it. You have Nominated IMZahidIqbal as my duplicate profile. I do not have any relation with this. Kindly take a notice.

Decline reason:

Quite a few edits of yours are about projects Zahid Iqbal is involved in, say Navcane, IDIN and the Plan 9 Startup Incubator. Sure there are multiple people named Zahid. But multiple people named Zahid interested in exactly those topics? Not likely. I'll also note some copyright violations over at Commons and a promotional tone of your edits unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 00:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hello.Zahid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

About the copyright violation, I posted all the sources of the images from where I was posting these images. Some senior editors have removed them without reading the sources. I clearly saying this account does not belong to me and it should be deleted or ban permanently if it conflicted to my account. About the common edits, I never see the username who involved in creation or edits of pages. It does not mean I am using two accounts to make the same things. You should ban other accounts IMZahidIqbal permanently. I have requested, I applied in the Wikimania with a presentation and this block will kill it. Please listen and unblock it.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block. Please lodge an appeal by raising it with the checkuser who imposed it, or via email to the Arbitration Committee. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your contributed article, Information Technology University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Information Technology University. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Information Technology University (Lahore). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Information Technology University (Lahore). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Greenbörg (talk) 05:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Plan 9 (startup incubator) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plan 9 (startup incubator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan 9 (startup incubator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]